![]() ![]() Golden numberism really took off in 2003, when Dan Brown published his megahit novel The Da Vinci Code, the story of a “religious symbologist” and Harvard professor who uses the Fibonacci sequence and the golden ratio to unwind a conspiracy involving the Knights Templar and modern-day descendants of Jesus. I don’t remember what I told Aronofsky about math, but it wasn’t that. Finally he drills a hole in his own skull to let some of the math pressure out and the movie arrives at what appears to be a happy ending. ![]() I forgot to mention it, but this movie is in black and white. The beautiful woman in the apartment next door is intrigued. Use your intuition.”) He gets a bad headache and twirls his hair even more intensely. He plays a lot of Go with his thesis adviser. He computes a 216-digit number, which seems to be the key to forecasting stock prices and is also possibly God’s secret name. Max feverishly programs his computer, which is named Euclid, and draws golden rectangle spirals, and stares for a good long while into the similar spirals of milk in his coffee. “I never saw that before,” says the impressed Hasid. He doodles some more Fibonaccis across the stock market pages of the newspaper. Now Max is interested, because those are Fibonacci numbers. The Hebrew word for “east” adds up to 144, the Hasid explains, and “the Tree of Life” comes to 233. He meets a Hasidic man who gets him interested in Jewish numerology, the practice called gematria where a word is turned into a number by adding up the numerical value of the Hebrew letters it contains. The main character of the movie is a number theorist named Max Cohen who thinks extremely intensely and twirls his fingers in his hair a lot. The friend of a friend was named Darren Aronofsky, and his movie Pi came out in 1998. ![]() We ate patty melts, I told him some stories, I forgot about it, years went by. He said he was making a movie about math and wanted to talk to a practitioner about what the mathematical life was really like. One day in the ’90s, I had dinner with a friend of a friend at the Galaxy Diner in New York. There’s a small but persistent school of financial analysis which holds that the golden ratio governs fluctuations in the stock market your Bloomberg terminal, should you be flush enough to have one, will draw little “Fibonacci lines” on the stock charts for you. An influential 1978 paper in the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry suggests that a set of false teeth, for maximum smile appeal, should have the central incisor 1.618 times the width of the lateral incisor, which should in turn be 1.618 times as wide as the canine. The number theorist George Ballard Mathews was already complaining about it in 1904, writing that “the ‘divine proportion’ or ‘golden section’ impressed the ignorant, nay even learned men like Kepler, with a sense of mystery, and set them a dreaming all kinds of fantastic symbolism.” Figures with lengths in golden proportion to one another are sometimes said to be inherently the most beautiful, though the claims that the Great Pyramid of Giza, the Parthenon, and the Mona Lisa were all designed on this principle aren’t well substantiated. There’s been a miasma of mysticism around the golden ratio for a long time. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |